Do you know what good teamwork looks like?

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Posted by: Betty

Taylor Studios has an awesome team.  Some of the reasons we function well as a team follow:

  • We check our egos at the door.
  • We have high integrity and trust each other.
  • Everyone wants to produce a high quality product.
  • We set goals and objectives.
  • Each of us keeps an open mind and accepts criticism and input.
  • We are respectful in our communication, yet encourage debate.
  • We treat our teammates as trusted advisers.
  • We hold each other accountable.

Today, I got an email from Matt Wiley, one of our Graphic Designers.  He was concerned that some of my tweets were not appropriate.  I had posted some silly ones that were probably more appropriate for personal tweeting versus company tweeting.  I often get in a hurry and tweet just to tweet instead of watching the quality of the tweet.  I appreciated his input and made changes.

We are pursuing a very large project.  This week, several of us presented to this potential client.  At the presentation, it was obvious we work well as a team.  After the client asked a question, one of us would start the answer then another would pop in and finish the thought.  It flowed smoothly and we conveyed that we have fun, are passionate about what we do and have an effective team.  I was telling Joe Taylor, the company co-founder, about the opportunity.  He said, “Well if you really want it, why don’t you make them an offer they can’t refuse?”  This morning I threw a brainstorm with Sam, Drew and Kara and we came up with a great idea to present to the client.

Our shop is very busy right now.  We are working overtime and people are on the road.  There are many upcoming installs.  The few weeks before an install can be stressful for project managers.  There always seems to be more details to figure out, more questions and more to dos.  When something goes slightly wrong it is easy to jump on the project manager and say, “Why didn’t you take care of this?”  For example, this week a subcontractor delivered a Great Blue Heron model that was not made to our specifications.  This meant Marc, our Model Shop Lead, had to spend a day fixing the model even though something else had already been scheduled for that day.  Jason noticed that everyone was asking why don’t we hold our subs, clients, vendors, etc. more accountable.  Jason knew this was not the time to add more stress to their plate.  As we often say, he reminded them to offer solutions instead of complaints and criticism.  With that perspective in mind, the team got down to business and came up with solutions.  We’ll look at what we could have done better at the lessons learned meeting we’ll have after the installs are done.

These examples from this week illustrate what good teamwork looks like.   My team rocks!

Tell us about a time when you saw good teamwork.

Was the Bid Apples to Apples?

Friday, July 30th, 2010

We recently bid a project along with 20 other firms.  Within a couple days, we received the bid tabulation sheet.  The bids ranged in price from $150,000 to $675,000.  Our bid was in the middle.  This was a fabrication-only project so each firm was provided the same drawings.  How could the bid amounts vary so greatly?  Some of the things I thought of were:

  • Lower quality product
  • Less service
  • No warranty
  • Lower labor costs
  • More efficient
  • Plan to change order for everything along the way
  • Do not plan to follow the specifications they bid
  • Materials are less expensive
  • Different fabrication method

I decided to do some follow-up on jobs we had lost because of a substantial price difference (over $100,000).  I sent some of my staff on the road to look at our competitor’s work (see Jason’s recent post).  Some of the clients they visited were our past clients, so these clients were able to compare their experience working with us and their experience working with the firm that underbid us.  When the clients began talking about their most recent experience, they made statements that included:

  • They did not meet their dates
  • They did not involve us in the process (e.g. weekly phone calls, approvals, website posts of progress, etc.)
  • They gave us samples of what they were going to produce and did not produce it
  • They asked for their money without providing the deliverable
  • They were on the phone during our meetings
  • We asked them to redo it several times
  • It isn’t what we wanted

At one of the sites we visited we noticed the other exhibit firm used a different fabrication method than we do.  In the coming weeks, we will analyze whether that is a more efficient method.  At this point, we do know it does not offer the opportunity for the client to critique the work along the way and the natural elements were not the quality we produce - from the species of trees to the undulations in the groundform to the transitions into the mural.

We talked to another client about the design process and whether they got the same level of detail in the design deliverables.  We were told our deliverables differed significantly.  We have seen the lack of detail in other designs.  Many lack even the simplest of measurements or the quantity of graphic panels.

As a company that has a foundation of being frugal and efficient, it can be frustrating to lose work to a substantially lower-priced firm.  We have a core value of high integrity and back up our commitments.  This means we will not buy the job and change order it later to make up the difference.  We will make it according to the samples provided, etc.

We will continue to conduct research and will attempt to show the marketplace the differences in deliverables.  When bids come back ranging drastically in price, there is no way the bids can be apples to apples.  If the project is awarded to a company simply because they offer the lowest price, one must ask how that firm can provide the same product and service as the other firms.

If you have chosen to work with a firm based on the low price of their bid, how was your experience?  Are you happy with the finished product?

What Does “Quality” Mean?

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Posted by: Jason

What does good quality look like?  Don’t all companies say they produce quality products?  How does saying your work is high-quality set you apart from your competitors?

I believe that several factors go into making a product a “Quality Product.”  Some might say that quality means the product has to be built to last.  I would have to agree with this statement and is one reason we offer a five-year warranty.  I think attention to detail plays a role in quality.

I recently visited a museum that just opened a new exhibit.  As I was walking around critiquing everything and comparing it to our work, I noticed some things that I would never accept or approve from our fabricators.  For instance, there were brad nail holes in painted framing that were left unfilled.  These holes stood out and were very noticeable.

brad-holes

I also noticed unfinished cabinets doors.  The inside edge was left unpainted/laminated.  The plywood ply’s were easily seen given the uneven cut of the door.  (No, this wasn’t a design element or accent.)

cabinet-door

I could also tell one particular wall was made of MDF given the lack of finish along the edges around an opening.  It looked like they didn’t sand the edge and just paint it.

Needless to say I was disappointed in the lack of attention to detail, but I left feeling good that we pay attention to those things.  I feel it is something that helps set us apart from our competitors and allows us to say we do quality work.  We fuss about the small stuff and pay attention to the details.

What does museum quality look like to you?

Posted by: Jason, Art Director